Con Report: MICE 2010

(Full disclosure: The organizers of MICE are personal friends, though I was not involved in the planning of the show.)

This Saturday just past saw the first of what looks to be a new annual convention in Boston: The Massachusetts Independent Comics Expo (MICE), organized by The Boston Comics Roundtable.  I’ve been eager to see a show like this in Boston for a long time, and have honestly been quite baffled that no such show existed.  We have a large comics-making community, a tremendous student population, and multiple truly excellent comics shops with strong independent comics stock (I’m thinking in particular of Million Year Picnic and Comicopia).  So it seems a no-brainer that our little city could easily make an indy comics show a great success; and I’m happy to report that it seems I was correct in this belief.

MICE was a relatively small show—only 47 tables, total—taking place in three modest rooms and a hallway at The Art Institute of Boston, but suffered none of the usual drawbacks to small shows: there was a pretty constant movement of people through the exhibitions, great attendance at panels, and a wonderful variety of comics, of satisfyingly high quality.  I heard no reports at all of organizational missteps.  A bit of confusion would have been forgivable, considering this was a first time out for all involved, but it seems there was nothing to forgive.  The space was set up attractively and efficiently, doors opened on time, and a lunch delivery was even arranged for the exhibitors, just like at MeCAF.  When the show was over, break down went very quickly—easily two dozen exhibitors happily volunteered to stay after to help with the clean up.

The focus of the show was entirely on truly independent creators—almost everything at the show was self-published, with a lot of mini-comics and small-scale projects.  This is a type of show that’s getting harder and harder to find.  The first couple of years I attended SPX, it had a similar focus, but more and more the mini-comics seemed to get pushed aside in favor of more traditional bound books.  MoCCA took SPX’s place in serving that type of material for several years, but since the move to the new location, I’ve seen a similar transition in the types of work that do well at the show.  I attribute this to the steadily rising table costs—mini-comics creators simply have no hope of making their table fees back anymore, so they don’t go.  Which means the audience that’s interested in buying mini-comics is beginning to dry up there as well.  I very much hope that as MICE grows, it will keep its focus solidly on the individual creator, rather than publishers.  I’ll say more about sales later in the post, but as a mini-comics exhibitor, if I were choosing between MoCCA and MICE to display at, purely on the basis of profitability, MICE is the clear winner.

One fear I did have going in, knowing it was a small show put on by a large group, was that too large a percentage of tables would be dedicated to BCR members—not that I have any problem with BCR member comics; I’m a BCR member, and I know just how large the BCR is these days, and how many incredibly talented people can claim membership.  But from the standpoint of the long term sustainability of the show, if it seemed like too much of a vanity affair, it would be hard to draw attendees from outside the local area.  My fear here was unfounded, I’m pleased to say—certainly, there were many BCR folks represented, but also a great many folks from outside the group, and many whom I had never before met.

There was a pleasant buzz of activity throughout most of the day, a steady stream passing through the exhibit rooms.  The age range was pretty wide, and I’m tempted to say I saw more high school and college age attendees than I’m accustomed to seeing at indy comics shows.  Admission was free, which I’m sure helped contribute to the large and energetic crowd—I heard rumor that a noticeable portion of attendees were actually walk-ins who spotted the show from the street and just decided to see what it was about.

The show also featured a nice selection of panels, across a range of topics.  I wasn’t able to attend an panels as an audience member, but I served on two panel.  The first was a panel on Writing Comics, which I presented in collaboration with Jerel Dye.  It was the first panel of the day, at 11:00 in the morning, so we went in expecting a pretty small audience—on this point, we were mistaken.  The room filled up quickly with an engaged group of aspiring writers, making for a very enjoyable session.  They happily joined in our prepared writing exercise, asked good questions, and offered each other good advice as well.

Later in the day came the Connecting Comics and Education panel, which for me was a particular treat.  At first it appeared that this was going to be a disappointingly small audience, but folks trickled over the course of the first fifteen minutes, until we had a much fuller room.  The discussion went far beyond the usual “give comics to reluctant readers” refrain, due in large part to the wide variety of experience on the part of the panelists.  All present were teachers, working with students from elementary school up through college, and teaching across several subjects: science, math, composition, social studies, not to mention the remarkable educational exchange program Marek Bennett has set up between his school in New Hampshire and a school in Nicaragua.  Dr. Jenn Cook offered some wonderful ideas for having students pre-write their memoirs as three panel comics as a way of organizing their essays—and idea I will very likely steal the next time I teach a composition class.  All told, I felt like I learned more than I contributed on this panel, and the audience too was very interested—when moderator David Marshall proposed extending the panel an extra half hour, panelists and audience gamely agreed.

As for sales: I should state first that I don’t generally expect high sales.  I’m not well known, and I don’t have very many books, and not all of my books lend themselves naturally to a comics show.  But, of course, anyone selling mini comics is likely to be relatively unknown and have a small number of books, so that’s who I hope these figures will be useful to.

To MoCCA, I brought the following materials:

Bring Your Daughter to Work Day (32 pages, $4.)

Gingerbread Houses 1 (32 pages, $5)

Gingerbread Houses 2 (32 pages, $5)

Character Design for Graphic Novels (194 pages, full color, $25)

Parens, a play  (98 pages, $8)

The play has little impact on the sales numbers, as it doesn’t fit the usual material at a comics show, but routinely sells exactly one copy at each show I attend.

The only change I made at MICE was to add Gingerbread Houses 3 (36 pages, $5), and I offered a bulk deal where anyone who purchased all three issues of GH got a free copy of BYDTWD.

All told, I sold a total of 21 books, for a gross income of $137 at MoCCA.  At MICE I sold a total of 25 books, for a gross of $126 (free copies of BYDTWD are not included in those numbers).  The higher income for fewer books at MoCCA is a result of the character design book—two copies sold at MoCCA, while none sold at MICE, which fits with my theory that higher-priced items with traditional production values are a better fit for that show.

BYDTWD technically sold better at MoCCA, where I moved nine paid copies, as opposed to only two at MICE, But, of course, my freebie offer cannibalized sales of that book considerably, so that’s not a fair comparison.

The biggest difference was in sales of Gingerbread Houses—at MoCCA, most people who looked at the mini put it right back down as soon as they heard the $5 asking price—they were unwilling to pay that much for a self-published mini.  At MICE however, browsers who got as far as asking the price were far less put out by it—there was much less debate as to whether to buy a copy, but instead a debate as to buy just the first or all three.  Most decided on all three, with seven full sets going at MICE, plus one additional copy of the first issue.  At MoCCA, of the 6 people who bought issue 1, only two decided to buy issue 2 as well.

Of course, 21 books vs 25 books, or $137 vs $126 doesn’t sound like a significant enough difference to be worth analyzing, but there are two additional bits of information that need to be considered.  First off, table cost: my half table at MICE cost me $25 dollars, as compared to the $105 I spent for a mere quarter table at MoCCA.  That makes my net profits $32 from MoCCA, as compared to $101 at MICE.

And the other detail is that MICE was just a one-day show, while MoCCA was a full two days.  It’s impossible to know how a second day would have gone, but even so: selling as much in one day at MICE as I did in two days at MoCCA is certainly a far better return on my time investment no matter how you look at it.

The only question I’m left with is whether I want the show to expand to two days next year.  Certainly, my sales numbers argue for putting in an extra day at this show, but I can’t help suspecting that attendance would drop considerably on a second day.  As much fun as the show was, it was pretty easy for attendees to see everything there was in a single day, making return attendance less likely.  Although, a counter argument to that would be the enthusiasm I saw for the panels—if the second day’s programming were to be as robust as the first, that might draw people back.  But that’s all speculation, as I know little of the dynamics of drawing crowds to cons.

Regardless, I’ll be very much looking forward to displaying at MICE again next year.

Massachusetts Independent Comics Expo (MICE)

To those of you in the greater Boston area: this weekend sees the premiere of MICE, a brand-new comics convention taking place in downtown Boston, organized by my compatriots in The Boston Comics Roundtable.  And admission is free!

I will be exhibiting my wares, including debuting the third print mini of Gingerbread Houses.  I will also be speaking on two panels: Writing for Comics at 11:00, and Connecting Comics and Education at 1:00.  I hope to see you there!

Guest Blogging at ComixTalk.com

I’m guest blogging at ComixTalk.com this week, and my first article is already up.  Here’s what’s coming:

  • Monday: A write-up on the first print collection of Family Man, by Dylan Meconis, which has renewed my love for what was already one of my absolute favorite comics.
  • Tuesday: A hefty interview with creator of historical science stories, Jim Ottaviani, whose latest book, T-Minus, told the story of the moon landing.
  • Wednesday: A breakdown of some terrible advice often given to writers, and whatever else catches my interest between now and then.
  • Thursday: Not-comics day!  I’ll be looking at several works that technically aren’t comics, but still combine words and pictures to tell stories in an interesting way.
  • Friday: Lists!  Quick summary reading recommendations, broken down categorically.

Projects Update

  • I received final proofs for the story I’ll have in Ryan North and David Malki’s Machine of Death anthology.  After a long wait, the book will finally arrive this October.  And my story has an illustration by Dorothy Gabrell!
  • Next week I’ll be doing a stint of guest blogging over at ComixTalk.net.  I’ve got a couple of my stories written up already, with some ideas of a few more things I’d like to talk about.  I haven’t written anything for ComixTalk in a long time, so I’m looking forward to it.
  • I completed a new short story, which is going to be illustrated by Bill Duncan.  I haven’t worked with Bill in years, but I always had a great time with him, so I’m very excited that we’ve got a project in the works again.  The story is loosely inspired by the old children’s rhyme, “There Was an Old Lady Who Swallowed a Fly.”
  • I’ve been working on pitches for a couple of new textbook projects.  The pitches are done, now I’m just waiting to see if either one gets picked up.  Things are looking good on at least one front, but nothing is definite yet.
  • Gingerbread Houses is still on track to wrap up by the end of this year.  Note to any publishers who might be reading this: Grug and I are definitely interested in getting a print edition of GH out.

Two More Comics Uploaded

When I launched the new TwentySevenLetters.com, two of my comics were left out because I couldn’t get them to display properly (they were very wide, and getting cut off at the edge of the page border).  With a little help, I’ve learned the solution to my problem, and have added both those comics to the site again!

Instructions for Use

Lives are Lived (a Simpleton strip)

Webcomics Vs. eBook Readers

This article was originally published on webcomics.com in 2008.

Okay, so the Amazon’s Kindle can’t handle images.  Neither, for that matter, can Sony’s Portable Reader System, a similar E Ink product that arrived in 2006 but received considerably less buzz.  This lack of image support has caused much complaint both within webcomics and in the general market.  Obviously, a device without image support is useless to webcomics readers and creators.  But the level of disappointment surprised me.  It hadn’t occurred to me that webcomics readers were really waiting for a new portable display technology.  Nearly every major display we have readily available on the market today is optimized for image display, from computer monitors to television screens, to PDAs, iPhones, and iPods.  And plenty of those are portable.  Granted, PDAs and iPods aren’t ideally sized for reading comics, but as laptops get increasingly lighter and more tablet-like, they will almost certainly fill the portable reader needs of any comics fan.

eBook readers simply aren’t needed for digital comics to advance.  There’s no lack of consumer technology for viewing images.  What we lack is a consumer technology that adequately handles large chunks of text.  That’s the point of E Ink—it makes large blocks of text more readable by eliminating the backlight and glare typical of existing display tech.  That said, it’s still a new technology.  Of course it will eventually handle images as well.  The fact that it doesn’t need to is beside the point—I don’t need image support in order to listen to music on my iPod either, but it sure didn’t take long for that to show up.  And there’s much more demand for images on eBook readers than there ever was for images on iPods.

The big question isn’t “if” or even “when,” since it probably won’t be very long—prototypes have already been seen—but “what will images look like on the new technology?”  Again, eBook readers aren’t backlit, and they don’t have much glare.  Those two aspects are what make screen displays appear similar to high-gloss paper.  Take them away, and you take away the glossiness as well.  (That’s the goal, after all, since glossiness isn’t well suited to text.)  Does that mean that comics won’t look as good as they do on screen?  Well, yes and no: different comics will look good on different devices, just as different comics look their best on different kinds of paper.  Black and white line art tends to look better with less gloss.  So does color artwork that strives for a more antique quality, such as Seth or Chris Ware.  But flashier art styles that use a lot of bold colors may end up looking flat or washed out, even once the technology matures.

And that diversification of display quality may be the most interesting possibility that eBooks have to offer webcomics—just as we have options other than high gloss when creating a print project, we may finally have an option other than high gloss when creating for the screen as well.  For those interested in exploring matte palettes, eBook readers may ultimately offer not just a new distribution channel, but new artistic opportunities as well.

RSS Reconsidered

This article was originally published on webcomics.com in 2008.

Last month I presented a list of webcomics technologies that have failed to ignite my technophilic enthusiasm, despite their popularity or general usefulness. Over the past several weeks, I have given one of those technologies, RSS, a second chance.

First a quick recap of my original objections to RSS, based on my early attempts to use RSS readers:

  1. Tracking RSS reads required keeping an additional application open, on top of my usual web browser. I’m already a multi-tasker, and disliked the additional clutter.
  2. As a creator, I wasn’t keen on having to create and maintain another tool for my website.
  3. As a reader, I found that only about a quarter of the blogs/comics I read had RSS feeds at the time, so using the reader didn’t really save me much effort anyway.
  4. Once my web browser was open, I just didn’t often remember to open the RSS reader, since it was basically redundant technology.

Despite all this, I did respect the goal of RSS — I can certainly appreciate the desire to have a single service tracking my web reads, keeping me informed of updates, so that I don’t waste time looking at sites that haven’t changed since my last visit. For this reason, I fell in love with Piperka.net rather quickly. It performs that same function, but without any of the problems that made RSS unsatisfactory; Piperka is a website that I can keep open in a tab of my regular web browser, and it can track almost any webcomic with no effort on the part of creators.

Of course, Piperka isn’t perfect. Comics that use non-standard content management don’t slip easily into the system (It’s only recently that Dicebox was finally included, and even now it only seems to catch updates when there’s a new chapter, rather than a weekly update). And for some reason Piperka will occasionally miss updates, sometimes several in a row, but will later randomly catch up. Or not, depending on the strip. I can’t remember the last time Dan Mazur’s Palindramas showed up in my Piperka updates, even though it updates pretty regularly. So there’s definitely room for improvement.

So, with all that in mind, several weeks ago I adopted Google Reader as my primary tool for following any webcomic I read that supports RSS. And just to be completely thorough in my experiment, I added most of the blogs I read to my RSS subscription list as well.

Some of my original objections fell away immediately — Google Reader is web-based, just like Piperka, and can be used in just as convenient a fashion, with no need for extra applications. I also found that a much larger percentage of my regular reads support RSS these days. The fact that so many comics hosting services have automated RSS feeds certainly helps. In fact, there were only a handful of exceptions among webcomics, and the only blog I couldn’t find a feed for was This Modern World.

Given the current near-ubiquity of RSS feeds, the RSS reader wound up with an advantage over Piperka — it’s much rarer for it to miss an update than for Piperka. In fact, the only site whose updates I’ve noticed as absent from my RSS reader is Webcomics.com. Whether this is due to a glitch in the reader or an error in the site’s own RSS code, I couldn’t say.

Another advantage that Google Reader offers over Piperka is the option of collecting webcomic and blog updates directly in the reader. Piperka is able to track any webcomic, with or without creator approval, precisely because it doesn’t scrape any content from the sites; it simply lets users know when those sites have updated. On the other side, since RSS feeds are creator-defined, they allow creators to opt-in to RSS syndication. Not all do, but enough do to make it a worthwhile feature for users of the software. And so long as all you want from the site is the comic itself, the presentation is perfectly satisfactory. My only major frustration on this front has been the Narbonic Director’s Commentary, where the feed sends me each day’s strip (which I’ve already read) but not the commentary (which is what I’m now following the strip for).

Ironically, I’m far less satisfied with the technology’s handling of blogs. Neither Journalista nor The Comics Reporter include images in their feeds, which is a big part of the value of both those sites. Journalista’s feed is still useful, since the bulk of the blog is text, though the lack of images makes it harder to scan quickly for interesting items. The Comics Reporter becomes nearly unreadable without images, however, since Tom Spurgeon has a habit of making posts with nothing but an image, a title, and a link to the subject of the post. And since the links are tied to the images, you don’t get those either, making it impossible to judge my interest in any of the books or events he’s mentioning without jumping back to his site for each one. And if that’s not troublesome enough, his posts also come through my RSS reader without any line or page breaks, making longer articles completely unreadable.

Of course, most of these content inclusion difficulties are likely due to user implementation, not a fault of the technology itself. And, with the exception of the missing paragraph breaks in The Comics Reporter, may even be conscious decisions on the part of the content creators, since it’s still desirable for them to draw readers back to their largely ad-supported web sites. For content creators, RSS feeds do pose a conundrum in finding a balance between financial self-interest and audience accommodation; creators looking to make money need ad views, while readers don’t want to have to jump out to the website every time there’s a new post. One solution some creators have found for this problem is to imbed advertising directly into their feeds in one way or another.

In the end, though, the problems of RSS are far outweighed by the benefits—I’ve gotten very comfortable with my RSS reader, and don’t see myself dropping it as I have in the past. The technology has matured considerably since my early trials; as of today, I am officially a convert.

Three Technologies I’m Just not that Excited About

This article was originally published on webcomics.com in 2008.

I love technology. Whether it’s little gadgets like my iPod, or useful applications like Google Calendar, I love all the little tech innovations that make life easier and more fun. The first time I heard about webcomics, I was thrilled. Automated content management? Fantastic! Integration of multi-media elements into webcomics? All over it. Do I want an iPhone or a Kindle? Oh my god, yes. Can I afford them? Not remotely. But I want them nonetheless.

And yet, there are certainly technologies that just don’t excite me. My first response to the “blog” was a hearty “meh.” I haven’t a clue what the appeal of MySpace or LiveJournal is — more industry-oriented variants, like ComicSpace make a little more sense to me, but just barely. And I still have no idea why the hell my telephone needs to take photographs. It’s bad enough that people can call me and talk to me no matter where I am, now they can demand that I send them pictures too? No thanks.

Sometimes I change my mind. Blogging, for instance, has won me over. Once I started seeing professionally themed blogs, news blogs, political blogs, blogs that served an informal journalistic purpose, the idea finally clicked for me. I still ignore most of the blogs that appear under the webcomics I read, but I can see the value of blogs, even if I think there are far too many of them.

With that in mind, I’ve decided to reexamine three webcomics-related technologies that have garnered my thorough disinterest in the past. I will lay out here, for the record, my initial reactions, and the reasons why I’m resistant to them. I will then devote a solid month of active usage to each before reporting back on my experiences and whether or not I’ve been converted.

RSS Feed Distribution

I’ve twice tried to use RSS reader applications to manage my blog reading. (One was Awasu. I can’t remember what the other was.) In both cases, I added about a quarter of the blogs I read to the reader (the other three quarters didn’t offer feeds), then proceeded to follow those blogs in the reader for about two weeks. After that, I stopped using it, mainly because I forgot I even had it. With so few of the blogs I followed readable in that form, I wasn’t able to break the habit of going to my web browser for blog-reading purposes. And, in any case, I disliked having to open a whole other application just to do some extra web browsing, especially since I tend to do my web browsing on more than one computer.

Now, many folks have been singing the praises of RSS feeds as a convenient way of reading comics; Webcomics.com’s own editor, T Campbell described the technology to me as “almost indispensable.” After my uninspiring early encounters with the technology, though, I’m skeptical. I can certainly see the appeal of not having to check every individual webcomic I read. It’s a huge time suck. Which is why I’m a devoted user of Piperka.net — a lovely little service that monitors my webcomics for me, and automatically generates a list of all the sites that have updated since my last visit. And unlike RSS, it manages this without putting any onus on comics authors to add yet another annoying technical doohickey to their websites. This is great for the creator, since they don’t have to do any extra work to have their comic included, and great for me, since almost every comic I read is included, instead of just the ones with RSS feeds.

So what do I need RSS for? I haven’t the faintest idea. One thing I can say for certain, though—if any RSS reader is going to impress me, it has to be web-based. I’m already a multi-tasker; with four or five applications running on my computer at any given time, I certainly don’t need a sixth. And I need to be able to access it from any computer, without installing new software to each one. Fortunately, it looks like RSS readers have moved in that direction since I last tried them out, so maybe my impression really will be different this time around.

Comics for Portable Devices

I already hate using my cell phone for anything at all, up to and including talking on it, so I’m not going to bother trying to read comics on it. But I’m open to trying comics on my iPod. I’ve seen a little bit already — I did download a handful of Brain Fist strips while I was working on my Daniel Merlin Goodbrey article. And I thought Goodbrey made good use of the delivery mechanism, crafting comics that benefited from the odd screen size. But I’m reminded of a Jason Shiga comic that was once described to me — the pages were all laid out vertically in a box. Each page had tabs on it, and the tabs each had holes in them, that allowed the pages to be lifted out with a metal rod. The holes were lined up just right so that inserting the rod into a different series of holes resulted in your lifting out a different series of pages. Each combination of pages told a different story.

It’s a remarkable idea, and my understanding is that the execution was very effective and entertaining. I’d love to see Shiga’s comics contraption in person and spend some time playing with it. But if that was how all of the comics I read were distributed, it’d be pretty ridiculous. It’s just not well suited to anything that isn’t designed expressly for that purpose, and it’s not efficient even for the ones that are. I feel much the same about reading comics on portable devices. It’s nice for the crazy formalist experiments that bend the technology to their will. I don’t mind an occasional inconvenience for the sake of a unique comics experience. But it’s really not how I want to read Wonderella.

Still, I do like my iPod, and I do like finding new uses for it (I just bought my first few RiffTrax today), even if I don’t normally use the video features. And with ClickWheel having just announced a bunch of new features and a deal with 2000AD, now seems like a good time to give the technology a try.

Downloadable Comics

Of the three technologies I’ll be looking at, downloadable comics is the one that I have the least initial opinion on, since I know the least about it. I did set up an account at Wowio a couple months ago, and downloaded a few comics. I read them, and the experience was fine. But I forgot to go back the next day to download more, and haven’t been back since. I just wasn’t that grabbed by it. I’ve never particularly liked reading any sort of document in PDF format, though it certainly has its advantages — the ability to print chief among them. I just wasn’t moved enough to go through the hassle of downloading and storing the files. But I wasn’t exactly turned off by the technology either—this really might be a case where I just need to get used to the new process before the advantages will really become clear to me. For now, let’s just call me “neutral” on the topic, and see what happens once I’ve immersed myself in it for a few weeks.

Start the Clock…

I’ve decided on RSS feeds as the subject of the first of my four-week technology stints. I’ve selected the reader I will use (Google Reader), and have started building my subscription list. For the duration of my trial period, I will use this reader as my primary means of staying up to date with my webcomics, relying on Piperka only for those series that don’t have RSS feeds. Check back next month for my full report.

NOTE: The incarnation of Webcomics.com for which this series was begun ceased publishing prior to the completion of the series.  Only my report on RSS feeds was completed.